- 【南京大虐殺】村上春樹「日本軍には捕虜を管理する余裕がなかったので、降伏した兵隊や市民の大方を殺害してしまいました。」 ©2ch.net
773 ：あなたの1票は無駄になりました＠無断転載は禁止[]：2017/02/28(火) 01:19:19.70 ID:lv6ImUku0 - >>758
これに対する英語拙訳をYouTubeのコメント欄にアップしました（もっと英語の得意な方の添削・訂正をお願いします。
その上で、海外に向け自由にそのテキストを拡散願います。）
In China, Tamaki Matsuoka is called “conscience of Japan”.
Shudo Higashinakano and Kenichi Ara, who belong to the Nanking Massacre denial school, criticize
this testimony collection because all the testimonies are anonymous and pseudonyms and then they
are not verified by third parties. They also criticize the unnatural way of the testimonies.
Whereas, even Katsuichi Honda and Kenji Ono, who belong to the Nanking Massacre affirmation school,
also criticize it, saying, “we have never seen such a book having so many mistakes like this.”
(Wikipedia: 松岡 環)
Ichikawa Shuhei (the Infantry 33rd Regiment 5th Squadron First Captain), who edited “The history
of the Infantry 33rd Regiment” said,“ She has never visited me for the hearing. When I asked two
other surviving fellows, they both said that she has not visited them yet....It is true that some
reserve soldiers did something bad, but roughly reading this book, I thought that 80% of the stories
such as rapes may be forged and the remaining 20% true.” And he commented, “There's said to be
59 members out of 102 former soldiers belonging to the 33rd infantry department, but we can assert
that it was fictional. We went out as a local troop and had the sense of solidarity, so when someone
was given an interview, we made a contact each other mutually. However, nobody has heard that someone
got interviewed. First of all, it was impossible for her to hear from 59 people when participants
living in Mie prefecture supposed to have been surveyed in 2000, because there were less than 30 people
surviving in 2000.” (Wikipedia: 松岡 環)
|