- 英和辞典 13 [転載禁止]©2ch.net
164 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 00:54:34.41 ID:/aAvEvRE - 和訳課題
There has been quite a lot of empirical work on fiscal policy since 2009,
and the preponderant conclusion of that work is that fiscal multipliers are larger, not smaller, than under pre-crisis conditions.
If you want to disagree with that work, OK, but explain why — a tossed-off remark won’t cut it.
The thing is, this matters — a lot. If fiscal policy is as effective as ever, if not more so,
then austerity policies did immense damage, and we really need to be ready to do stimulus in the next downturn. But that has no chance of taking place if even economists who should be well-informed just make up a policy history that never happened.
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
396 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 12:02:32.03 ID:/aAvEvRE - >>395
和訳課題
There has been quite a lot of empirical work on fiscal policy since 2009,
and the preponderant conclusion of that work is that fiscal multipliers are larger, not smaller, than under pre-crisis conditions.
If you want to disagree with that work, OK, but explain why — a tossed-off remark won’t cut it.
The thing is, this matters — a lot. If fiscal policy is as effective as ever, if not more so,
then austerity policies did immense damage, and we really need to be ready to do stimulus in the next downturn. But that has no chance of taking place if even economists who should be well-informed just make up a policy history that never happened.
あなたがこれを和訳できますか？できないならでかい口を叩いてはいけません。
さあやってごらんなさい。
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
398 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 12:08:59.35 ID:/aAvEvRE - >>397
この程度の英文を和訳出来ない人間が英和辞典を語るのは間違い。
二度と書き込まないように。
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
402 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 12:19:57.61 ID:/aAvEvRE - >>399
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/policy-effectiveness-since-2008/
a policy history that never happenedとは具体的にどういことですか？
説明しなさい。
簡単すぎるかな。
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
404 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 12:22:20.70 ID:/aAvEvRE - 和訳まだあ。遅いよ。
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
407 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 12:27:57.17 ID:/aAvEvRE - >>403
ここは英和スレだ。
和訳出来ない人間に発言権はない。
和訳できならさっさと出て行け。
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
408 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 12:32:01.75 ID:/aAvEvRE - >>406
日本語が不自由なのはよく分かったからさっさと出てけ
お前中卒だろ
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
433 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 16:17:00.49 ID:/aAvEvRE - >>417
There has been quite a lot of empirical work on fiscal policy since 2009,
and the preponderant conclusion of that work is that fiscal multipliers are larger, not smaller, than under pre-crisis conditions.
If you want to disagree with that work, OK, but explain why — a tossed-off remark won’t cut it.
The thing is, this matters — a lot. If fiscal policy is as effective as ever, if not more so,
then austerity policies did immense damage, and we really need to be ready to do stimulus in the next downturn. But that has no chance of taking place if even economists who should be well-informed just make up a policy history that never happened.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/29/policy-effectiveness-since-2008/
a policy history that never happenedとは具体的にどういことですか？
説明しなさい。
じゃあこれやってみろ。
和訳じゃないぜ。
日銀総裁も毎日読んでるよ。
| - 紙の英和辞典について語るスレ3 [無断転載禁止]©2ch.net
434 ：名無しさん＠英語勉強中[]：2015/12/31(木) 16:18:55.87 ID:/aAvEvRE - スーパーアンカーを使ってやってみな。
どれだけ役に立つかそれで分かるだろ。
|
|